Test ID: SM Smith (Sm) Antibodies, IgG, Serum
Reporting Name
Sm Ab, IgG, SUseful For
Evaluating patients with clinical features suggestive of antinuclear antibody associated connective tissue disease and the confirmation of a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Testing for Smith antibodies is not useful in patients without demonstrable antinuclear antibodies.
Clinical Information
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by circulating autoantibodies to many intracellular targets. Of these autoantibodies, the anti-Smith (Sm) antibody associated with a positivity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is one of the earliest to be described.(1) The Sm antigen is a complex molecule consisting of a group of core proteins with molecular weights ranging from 9 to 29.5 kDa [B (B1, 28 kDa), B’ (B2, 29 kDa), N (B3, 29.5 kDa), D1 (16 kDa), D2 (16.5 kDa), D3 (18 kDa), E (12 kDa), F (11 kDa), and G (9 kDa)].(2) Of these core proteins, the B and D polypeptides are frequently targeted by the Sm autoimmune response.(3) The Sm proteins, together with ribonucleoproteins and small nuclear RNA form a RNA-protein complex or small nuclear ribonucleoprotein, which is involved in precursor messenger RNA (mRNA) splicing, a process which ultimately leads to mature mRNA generation.(4)
The presence of antibodies to Sm is specific for SLE with a sensitivity of 5% to 30%.(1) Based on the 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SLE, patients positive for anti-Sm antibodies already fulfil 60% of the criteria required for SLE classification.(5,6) However, anti-Sm antibodies may occur together ribonucleoprotein antibodies in certain ANA-associated connective tissue disease such as mixed connective tissue disease, systemic sclerosis and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.(7) In a recent study, patients double-positive for anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies at the time of the diagnosis of SLE were reported to be at higher risk of flares and may benefit from stringent monitoring and early preventive treatment.(8) In addition, some studies have suggested that positivity for anti-Sm antibody may be dependent on patient’s ethnicity.(8)
In routine clinical practice, antigen-specific (solid-phase) immunoassays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, addressable laser bead immunoassays, line immunoassays, chemiluminescent immunoassays, BioPlex immunoassay and fluorescent enzyme immunoassays are widely used in determination of anti-Sm antibodies.(6,9) These immunoassays use, either a mixture of (native) Sm antigens or a specific (recombinant) Sm antigen, usually obtained by purification of nuclear extract or produced by in vitro translation, respectively, coated to a solid phase (e.g. plate/well, membrane, bead).(6) In the past, anti-Sm tests used a mixture of all Sm proteins purified from a native source. These mixtures often also contained other proteins, such as U1-RNP, which must be taken into consideration when interpreting results. Based on the analytical differences in immunoassays for detecting anti-Sm antibodies, the method used for their detection is likely to impact the diagnostic performance characteristics.
For more information see:
Interpretation
A positive anti-Smith antibody result in the appropriate clinical context is consistent with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Report Available
1 to 3 daysDay(s) Performed
Monday through Saturday
Clinical Reference
1. Tan EM, Kunkel HG. Characteristics of a soluble nuclear antigen precipitating with sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 1966;96(3):464-471
2. Zieve GW, Khusial PR. The anti-Sm immune response in autoimmunity and cell biology. Autoimmun Rev. 2003;2(5):235-240
3. Billings PB, Hoch SO. Characterization of U small nuclear RNA-associated proteins. J Biol Chem. 1984;259(20):12850-12856
4. Battle DJ, Kasim M, Yong J, et al. The SMN complex: an assembly machine for RNPs. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:313-320
5. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(9):1400-1412
6. van Beers JJBC, Schreurs MWJ. Anti-Sm antibodies in the classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Transl Autoimmun. 2022;5:100155
7. Migliorini P, Baldini C, Rocchi V, Bombardieri S. Anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies. Autoimmunity. 2005;38(1):47-54
8. Kwon OC, Park MC. Risk of systemic lupus erythematosus flares according to autoantibody positivity at the time of diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3068
9. Llorente MJ, Jimenez J, Gonzalez C, et al. Effectiveness of different methods for anti-Sm antibody identification. A multicentre study. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(7):748-752
Method Name
Multiplex Flow Immunoassay
Specimen Type
SerumSpecimen Required
Collection Container/Tube:
Preferred: Serum gel
Acceptable: Red top
Submission Container/Tube: Plastic vial
Specimen Volume: 0.5 mL
Collection Instructions: Centrifuge and aliquot serum into a plastic vial.
Specimen Minimum Volume
0.35 mL
Specimen Stability Information
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time | Special Container |
---|---|---|---|
Serum | Refrigerated (preferred) | 21 days | |
Frozen | 21 days |
Special Instructions
Reference Values
<1.0 U (negative)
≥1.0 U (positive)
Reference values apply to all ages.
Test Classification
This test has been cleared, approved, or is exempt by the US Food and Drug Administration and is used per manufacturer's instructions. Performance characteristics were verified by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements.CPT Code Information
86235
LOINC Code Information
Test ID | Test Order Name | Order LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
SM | Sm Ab, IgG, S | 18323-6 |
Result ID | Test Result Name | Result LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
SM | Sm Ab, IgG, S | 18323-6 |
mml-Behavioral, mml-Demyelinating-Diseases, mml-Neuroimmunology, mml-Pediatric, mml-Spinal-Cord